Wrestling Legend Reflects on Controversial Match Format

Summary

– Jeff Jarrett addresses the criticism of TNA’s King of the Mountain match.

– He believes the match is misunderstood and offers strong storytelling.

– Jarrett argues that a vocal minority has unfairly influenced the match’s reputation.

Jeff Jarrett’s tenure in TNA Wrestling is often a hot topic among fans, especially regarding his creation, the King of the Mountain match. This unique match format, featuring intricate rules and a penalty box, has faced significant criticism over the years. However, Jarrett recently defended the concept on his “My World” podcast, insisting it is a compelling narrative device.

Jarrett expressed frustration over the match’s negative reputation: “It’s good storytelling. Why is it criticized? I think a narrative gets started.” He suggested that much criticism came from a vocal minority and didn’t reflect the broader audience’s views. Citing the small number of reviews compared to the pay-per-view audience, Jarrett questioned whether these critiques represented fan satisfaction.

The King of the Mountain match, introduced in 2004, requires wrestlers to earn eligibility to win by pinning or submitting opponents, who are then sent to a penalty box. The eligible wrestler must then hang the title belt on a hook above the ring to win, reversing the traditional ladder match format. This match became a staple of TNA’s Slammiversary events from 2005 to 2007 and was briefly revived in 2015. The format even saw a gender-inclusive adaptation with the first-ever Queen of the Mountain match, won by Jordynne Grace in 2022.

Jarrett’s comments highlight his belief in the match’s potential for storytelling and excitement despite its complex rules and mixed reception among fans.