Bischoff’s Take on Why Nash and Hall Couldn’t Clash in the Ring
Summary
– Eric Bischoff discusses the potential feud between Kevin Nash and Scott Hall, explaining why it never resonated with fans.
– He emphasizes that Nash and Hall hesitated to engage in a feud lacking a compelling story.
– Bischoff agrees with the idea that the feud never took off because the wrestlers and fans preferred them as a tag team.
In an insightful segment from the “83 Weeks” podcast, Eric Bischoff delves into the dynamics between Kevin Nash and Scott Hall, specifically addressing why a major feud between the two never materialized in a way that resonated with fans. Bischoff, known for his deep understanding of wrestling storylines and character development, offers a unique perspective on this missed opportunity in wrestling history.
Bischoff explains that while Nash and Hall were not opposed to working against each other, they were hesitant to engage in a storyline that didn’t feel right. According to Bischoff, the potential feud lacked a compelling narrative and the necessary layers that would have made it engaging for both the wrestlers and the audience. This lack of a strong story was a significant factor in why the feud never took off.
He also agrees with the sentiment that the fans never really got behind the idea of Nash and Hall feuding. This lack of enthusiasm can be attributed to the audience’s strong connection with them as a tag team. Nash and Hall, as part of the iconic duo in the New World Order (nWo), had established a rapport with the audience that made it difficult for fans to see them as adversaries.
Bischoff’s commentary sheds light on the complexities of wrestling storytelling and the importance of having a narrative that resonates with both the performers and the fans. The potential Nash-Hall feud serves as a reminder that in wrestling, the success of a storyline hinges not just on the in-ring action but also on the depth and believability of the story being told.
