The Championship Debate: Rollins vs. Reigns
How a champion carries their title can define their legacy in professional wrestling. Recently, Seth Rollins, the self-proclaimed “visionary of WWE,” took a moment to reflect on this very aspect of his career and, in doing so, drew a fascinating contrast between himself and the ‘Head of the Table,’ Roman Reigns.
With his decade-long tenure in WWE, Rollins has seen highs and lows, victories and defeats. But throughout his journey, one thing has remained consistent: his reverence for the championship titles he’s won. In a candid conversation on “After the Bell,” Rollins delved deep into the philosophy of being a champion. He believes in the tangible representation of the title, in physically wearing and showcasing the World Heavyweight Championship, making it visible and prominent.
On the other hand, Roman Reigns, another stalwart of WWE, has a different approach. According to Rollins, Reigns seems to merge his identity with the championship. It’s as if Reigns becomes the championship, embodying its essence rather than merely holding or representing it. This subtle yet profound difference in their approaches to championship reigns offers a fresh perspective on what it means to be at the pinnacle of professional wrestling.
Rollins’ admiration for another wrestling legend, CM Punk, also came to the fore during the discussion. He expressed a desire to emulate Punk’s style of championship representation. This nod to Punk, a wrestler known for his outspoken nature and unique approach to the business, adds another layer to Rollins’ perspective. It’s a reminder that every champion, influenced by predecessors, brings their flavor to the title reign.
While Rollins and Reigns have had their fair share of memorable moments in WWE, their philosophies toward championships set them apart. It’s a testament to the depth and diversity of characters in WWE, where two top-tier athletes can have such distinct views on a similar aspect of their careers.
As fans, we’re left to ponder: Is it more impactful for a champion to embody the title, making it an intrinsic part of their persona, or to represent and showcase it, emphasizing its external prestige? Only time will tell which approach leaves a more lasting legacy in the annals of WWE history.
